The emergence of social networking has caused mixed opinions among the researchers and sociologists. On the one hand, online communication can have serious consequences for teenagers who waste their time on sitting in front of their monitors and communicating online with other teenagers.
There is also a threat of teenagers using inappropriate sites and information and, therefore, parents can control less their education and upbringing. On the other hand, social networking contributes to greater connection and socialization with people all over the world and advancement of literacy, business activities, and communication skills.
What is more important, today’s social networks are frequently used for business purposes, such as selecting candidates for a job and exploring new media means for information exchange. In this respect, Havenstein’s article called One in Five Employers Uses Social Networks in Hiring Process reveals benefits of using online profiles.
Similarly to Havenstein’s overview, Blow discusses the implications and analysis of A Profile of Online Profile that contribute to psychological and sociological analyses of individuals. Like the two previously characterized articles, Lewin singles out advantages of using social networks for increasing communication and literacy skills (n. p.). In total, all the authors apply to technology and statistics to present the outcomes of their observations.
The articles under consideration prove that the use of social networks allows participants to carry out a psychological analysis and define a profile of a person socializing on the Internet. In particular, most people take advantage of online profile to toss out the candidates for a particular job.
Using such characteristics as profile pictures, photo examination, personal information, qualifications, and confidential data, managers can judge on the appropriateness of the tentative employee for a particular position (Havenstein n. p.). A psychological analysis is also possible to underscore other parameters such as gender, communication, lying, and purposes, as it has been presented by Blow (n. p.).
Specifically, the author provides several deductions from the information presented on the profile pages of the online users to define certain regularities and implications for personal analysis (Blow n. p.).
Finally, although Levin in his article called Teenagers’ Internet Socializing Not a Bad Thing does not provide psychological portfolio of teenagers, yet his suggestions about the positive contributions of social networks are also based on the examination of different online profiles. In general, all the articles provide valuable information on multi-facet application and utilization of social networks and online communication.
It should be stressed that both Havenstein and Lewin provide the readers with positive aspects and benefits of applying to information presenting within virtual space. To an extent, Blow also discloses positive implications for communicating online, but with less emphasis placed on specific characteristics.
Hence, Havenstein outlines positive outcomes that can be drawn from the overview of candidate’s profile information, which are specifically useful for managers because they will have to spend less time on interviewing the candidates whose profile does not fit the requirements (n. p.).
The same benefits are also disclosed by Lewin who focuses on the positive contributions social networking makes for teenagers (n. p.). The researcher’s emphasis on communication skills, exploration of new media and software programs as well as enhancement of literacy skills is appropriate for providing the favorable influence of the Internet on education and development of contemporary teenagers.
Despite the fact that Blow approaches this issue in a more neutral way, the observations in general have a positive impact on evaluating the significance of social networks in life of the globalized community.
It should be stressed that successful communication is the basic condition for creating a favorable environment within society. Therefore, social networking is a contributing factor to this sphere of human relations.
As such, all the articles touch upon the value of online socialization as far as the globalization process is concerned. Hence, according to Havenstein, most of the company managers rely on virtual profiles of the applicants to select those that fit perfectly certain requirements (n. p.).
They can establish contact with their candidatures online and check the level of their competency as well as communication skills. Similarly to Havenstein, Levin accentuates on the importance of social networks with specific reference to online communication that widens the experience of teenagers and deepens their comprehension of specific social situations (n. p.).
Finally, Blow also discloses the importance of interaction via virtual media because it contributes to better psychological cognition of personal skills of individuals. In addition, it is possible to admit that Blow evaluates the examined phenomenon not as the scope of communication but as the outcomes of socialization and interaction (n. p.).
The findings the scholar has received indicate what assumptions can be made while communicating online. One way or another, the articles prove the significance of virtual space for enhancing relations between people all over the world, irrespective of their culture, location, and preferences.
Finally, while pursing a specific goal in their studies, all authors rely on statistical analysis and usage of technologies for receiving results.
Presence of ratios, percentage, diagrams, and charts indicate the depths of their researchers and underscore the accuracy and validity of the presented findings. Specifically, Havenstein refers to CareerBuilder.com to produce the assumptions and analyze the influence of online communication on business activities (n. p.).
Lewin gives credit the study conducted by MacArthur Foundation to present observations and conclusions about positive impact of distant socialization (n. p.). Like the previous two, Blow also applies to a sophisticated analysis of numerical data to single out qualitative findings.
It should also be noted that all the authors attain great importance to statistics and emphasize its relevance for the discussed problem. In fact, technology and internet are closely intertwined because the Internet is the outcome of technological advancement that contributes to further development of online devices.
Therefore, the usage of specific software and other technologies has a strong popularity among the usages of virtual space because it promotes further study of the problem in question.
In conclusion, all the articles are closely interconnected in terms of the psychological analysis of online profiles, benefits and positive outcomes of socializing through existing social networks, using technologies for analyzing data.
All the articles have been presented in a publicist style because they are destined for newspaper readers. Authors expose information in a clear and easy way for wide audience to understand the scope of their research. In addition, the articles have emphasized the importance of using technological devices as an inherent component of online era.
Moreover, the articles have sufficient implications for further analysis of beneficial aspects of using distant socialization for outlining perspectives of development in the sphere of education. Finally, the writing style of the articles is also worth noting because all texts are reminiscent in terms of logical representation, readability, and analysis of outcomes.
Blow, Charles M. “A Profile of Online Profiles.” New York Times. 9 Sept. 2008. Web. 11 May 2011.
Havenstein, Heather. “One in Five Employers Uses Social Networks in Hiring Process.” Computerworld. 12 Sept. 2008. Web. 11 May 2011.
Lewin, Tamar. “Teenagers’ Internet Socializing Not a Bad Thing.” New York Times. 19 Nov. 2008. Web. 11 May 2011.