First Nowadays we have a move that

First of all we have to start with the historical
events. Both countries came from one of the great historical backgrounds. The
rules of British empire stayed with its influence until late 1950`s. India
gained their independence in 1947 but the Israel go it in 1948, so eight years
later than India. Both have wise history from ancient times, which is very brighter
and interesting, than other states in the world. India has very long history of
peaceful Jewish relations with presence and now relationship has thrived on the
same changes of parliamentary democracy in many years.

After does two main facts from its
history they formed a democratic state with multicultural population and have
experienced dynamic revolution, especially in sectors like technology, driven
economic growth. India and Israel have also a huge minority of Muslim
population witch later in future will cause some problems. There are
approximately 100,000 Jews which came from Indian-origin in Israel. The waves
of immigration towards Israel from India it took place in begging of the
fifties and sixties. The main were coming from Maharashtra, small number
society came from Kerala and Kolkata. Nowadays we have a move that appears from
Indian Jews settlers from the part of North Eastern states coming along from
India towards Israel land. The next and older generation that still comes to
maintains strong an Indian relation to the lifestyle in their great cultural
and spiritual links with the India, apparently with the coming younger and
supposal generation that increasingly are getting mixed into Israel society.
India and Israel each face ballistic missile threats from at least one close,
hostile Muslim state. India on 17th of September 1950 announced a recognition
of Israel state, so 2 years after gaining the independence. They both have a
common law and similar government structures, liberal way of education,
knowledge of the part of English language gained during the colonies times,
great strengths in the part of the knowledge of a highly qualified scientific
and industry. The Indo-Israel at that time were characterized by partial
pro-Arab and anti-Israeli Foreign policy. This reflects Indians own interest in
the Middle East as well as its traditional Arabs sympathy, it was a further
influenced by India’s commitment to the Non-Aligned Movement and opinion of
Indian Muslims.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

The biggest event was the attack on
al-Aqsa mosque in 1969, which was apparently made by Israel and had an
influence on relations with India. The influence of Azad was considered in the
way of deferring towards the normalization in the region. Another event was An
Afro-Asiatic Conference of 1955. The conference was taken in Bandung,
Indonesia. The twenty-five countries that took part of the conference were
represented of nearly one-fourth of the Earth land surface. This event was
organized by Indonesia, Burma, Pakistan, Ceylon and India was control by Ruslan
Abdul Ghani, one of the secretaries general of the Indonesian Ministry of
Foreign Affairs. The conference stated aim to promote an Afro-Asian economic
and cultural cooperation. Also oppose a colonialism, which was a problem at
that time and avoided once again in history.

India and Israel were the only democratic countries in their
respective region. India initially exploited the Israel issue in trying to take
their interest with Arab word and also Islamic countries. Another very important
similarities between them two the most commend used aspects is the political
link in statehood and religion. Although India is constitutionally a secular
state, with traditionally history and opposed the notions to its way of
consisting. The religion should be a basis for nationality, In such a country
like India. The most disputes were about the Kashmir region, the most important
wish was not to do nothing upset with its local community. An international
developments as well as political way of style, that mostly had considerations
with gradually mounted up for the prevention of any meaningful way from
diplomatic interaction between the two sides.
A huge change, affecting Indians attitude towards Israel, was in 1991. Where
indeed India, totally changed their foreign policy. This change result a new
proved more suitable for meeting with the challenges for the new coming
century. There are five profound changes in Indian foreign policy made by Raja
C. Mohan. Which also had an influence on the policy to Israel:
‘ A shift in national orientation from domestically focused socialism to

Redirection of the economy: liberalization with the emphasis on
trade and foreign investment, which replaced the begging bowl as a symbol of
Indian diplomacy.

Abandonment of India`s forty-year love affair with the Third
World, symbolized by its obsession with Non-Alignment and its leadership in
that movement. India became more interested in participating in directing the
international system rather remaining merely a discontented leader of the Third
World ‘trade union’. The national self-interest became the driving force behind
Indian diplomacy.

Rejection of instinctive anti-Western, which for four decades
had dominated Indian thinking on the global order.

Israel had hope that India in addition with them will gain
better diplomacy. These points also encourage other Asia countries, this
development would also encourage Asian Muslim countries in particular to
establish better diplomatic relations. India`s independence diplomatic animus
and political opportunism towards Israel didn’t occur not a stem from any
religious or cultural pre-disposition. It was and expression of realpolitik and
was an over-conscientious, the act of what was at that time a fledgling. The
third world country by some very powerful confronted, well established and
hostile adversaries.

India and Israel during Cold War period

In 1992 India and Israel fully established diplomatic relations,
and since then the bilateral relationship has blossomed. India`s decision to
established that relations was based on situation in the world. It was a
response, to the changing global realities unshared in with the end of Cold
War. This acceptance was obvious from begging, were all of the primary reasons
for India`s gradual shift in the policy that was made:
No amount of deference to the Arab world would overpower its loyalties to
Pakistan ‘- loyalties shaped by racism and religious supremacism.

Zionism was the liberation movement of the Jewish people, not
even remotely akin to colonialism, imperialism, or racism; Israel was not a
colonial power.